RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5500 Mobile

Place in the ranking	75	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	84.16
Power efficiency	18.95	44.60
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA103	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7424	2816
Core clock speed	975 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	22,000 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	348.0	187.4
Floating-point processing power	22.27 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	48
TMUs	232	88
Tensor Cores	232	88
Ray Tracing Cores	58	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A5500 Mobile 45.43
+0.2%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A5500 Mobile 17463
+0.2%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17435

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124 +3.3%	120−130 −3.3%
1440p	81 +1.3%	80−85 −1.3%
4K	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.41
1440p	no data	8.11
4K	no data	11.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	129 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%
Elden Ring	129 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +3.6%	55−60 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	244 +1.7%	240−250 −1.7%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +5%	100−105 −5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Valorant	180−190 +2.8%	180−190 −2.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	44 +10%	40−45 −10%
Dota 2	151 +0.7%	150−160 −0.7%
Elden Ring	160−170 +1.9%	160−170 −1.9%
Far Cry 5	108 +8%	100−105 −8%
Fortnite	190−200 +5.6%	180−190 −5.6%
Forza Horizon 4	200 +5.3%	190−200 −5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Metro Exodus	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +5%	200−210 −5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +3.1%	160−170 −3.1%
Valorant	180−190 +2.8%	180−190 −2.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 +3.3%	270−280 −3.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Dota 2	155 +3.3%	150−160 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +4%	100−105 −4%
Forza Horizon 4	178 +4.7%	170−180 −4.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +5%	200−210 −5%
Valorant	180−190 +2.8%	180−190 −2.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
Elden Ring	95−100 +3.2%	95−100 −3.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +4.2%	95−100 −4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +4.4%	45−50 −4.4%
World of Tanks	280−290 +2.5%	280−290 −2.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	129 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +5.6%	90−95 −5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +5%	80−85 −5%
Valorant	150−160 +1.3%	150−160 −1.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Dota 2	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Elden Ring	45−50 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Metro Exodus	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0.7%	150−160 −0.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +10%	50−55 −10%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +8.9%	45−50 −8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Dota 2	132 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Fortnite	65−70 +6.2%	65−70 −6.2%
Forza Horizon 4	68 +4.6%	65−70 −4.6%
Valorant	80−85 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%

This is how RTX A5500 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX A5500 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
RTX A5500 Mobile is 1% faster in 1440p
RTX A5500 Mobile is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	45.43	45.35
Recency	22 March 2022	12 February 2024
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	70 Watt

RTX A5500 Mobile has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 135.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX A5500 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.

Be aware that RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.