RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5500 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX A5500 Mobile
2022
16 GB GDDR6
39.72

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX A5500 Mobile by an impressive 66% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGA103SAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74246144
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors22,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt (80 - 165 Watt TGP)130 Watt
Texture fill rate365.4417.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A5500 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
−58.7%
200−210
+58.7%
1440p72
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
4K50
−60%
80−85
+60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 129
−62.8%
210−220
+62.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−57.9%
180−190
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−57.4%
170−180
+57.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 114
−57.9%
180−190
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−65.3%
200−210
+65.3%
Hitman 3 187
−60.4%
300−310
+60.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130
−61.5%
210−220
+61.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
−56.3%
150−160
+56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 98
−63.3%
160−170
+63.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−57.9%
180−190
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−57.4%
170−180
+57.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
−59.1%
140−150
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−65.3%
200−210
+65.3%
Hitman 3 171
−63.7%
280−290
+63.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
−60.4%
170−180
+60.4%
Metro Exodus 99
−61.6%
160−170
+61.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
−56.3%
150−160
+56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 205
−46.3%
300−310
+46.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
−61.3%
150−160
+61.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−57.9%
180−190
+57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−59.6%
150−160
+59.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−65.3%
200−210
+65.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
−56.9%
160−170
+56.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 77
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Hitman 3 105
−61.9%
170−180
+61.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
−57.3%
140−150
+57.3%
Metro Exodus 59
−61%
95−100
+61%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
−55.6%
70−75
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−54.8%
130−140
+54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Hitman 3 44
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 31
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−50%
27−30
+50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−50%
45−50
+50%

This is how RTX A5500 Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 59% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 53% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.72 65.91
Recency 30 March 2022 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 130 Watt

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A5500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A5500 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 25 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.