RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	173	75
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	88.07
Power efficiency	31.99	44.51
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2816
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1230 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.4	187.4
Floating-point processing power	10.08 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	128	88
Tensor Cores	128	88
Ray Tracing Cores	32	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264.0 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 31.29

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 43.54
+39.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A3000 Mobile 12503

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17398
+39.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100 −30%	130−140 +30%
1440p	54 −38.9%	75−80 +38.9%
4K	47 −38.3%	65−70 +38.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.99
1440p	no data	8.65
4K	no data	9.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 −29.9%	100−105 +29.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −29%	120−130 +29%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 −34.3%	90−95 +34.3%
Forza Horizon 4	164 −34.1%	220−230 +34.1%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 −31%	110−120 +31%
Metro Exodus	103 −35.9%	140−150 +35.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −34.3%	90−95 +34.3%
Valorant	120−130 −31.8%	170−180 +31.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −29%	120−130 +29%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	55 −36.4%	75−80 +36.4%
Dota 2	130 −38.5%	180−190 +38.5%
Far Cry 5	85 −29.4%	110−120 +29.4%
Fortnite	150−160 −39.1%	210−220 +39.1%
Forza Horizon 4	134 −34.3%	180−190 +34.3%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 −31%	110−120 +31%
Grand Theft Auto V	124 −37.1%	170−180 +37.1%
Metro Exodus	49 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −35.9%	250−260 +35.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −34.3%	90−95 +34.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −35.1%	150−160 +35.1%
Valorant	120−130 −31.8%	170−180 +31.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 −26.4%	350−400 +26.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −29%	120−130 +29%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −30.4%	60−65 +30.4%
Dota 2	132 −36.4%	180−190 +36.4%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −34.8%	120−130 +34.8%
Forza Horizon 4	114 −31.6%	150−160 +31.6%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 −31%	110−120 +31%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −35.9%	250−260 +35.9%
Valorant	120−130 −31.8%	170−180 +31.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	62 −37.1%	85−90 +37.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 −37.1%	85−90 +37.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −37.1%	240−250 +37.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%
World of Tanks	200−210 −38.8%	290−300 +38.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −34.9%	85−90 +34.9%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 −25%	35−40 +25%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −37.3%	140−150 +37.3%
Forza Horizon 4	86 −27.9%	110−120 +27.9%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −32.1%	70−75 +32.1%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −37%	100−105 +37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −32.1%	70−75 +32.1%
Valorant	95−100 −36.8%	130−140 +36.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Dota 2	49 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	49 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −37.3%	140−150 +37.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	49 −32.7%	65−70 +32.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Dota 2	77 −29.9%	100−105 +29.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Fortnite	40−45 −27.9%	55−60 +27.9%
Forza Horizon 4	51 −37.3%	70−75 +37.3%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%
Valorant	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 30% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 39% faster in 1440p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.29	43.54
Recency	12 April 2021	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 39.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.