GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
11.03

RTX 5080 Mobile outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 526% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.4464.46
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB203
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)2 April 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15367680
Core clock speedno data975 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data360.0
Floating-point processing powerno data23.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
−525%
200−210
+525%
1440p14
−507%
85−90
+507%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−465%
350−400
+465%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−500%
300−310
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−465%
350−400
+465%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Far Cry 5 30
−500%
180−190
+500%
Fortnite 65−70
−497%
400−450
+497%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−500%
210−220
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−510%
250−260
+510%
Valorant 100−110
−488%
600−650
+488%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−500%
300−310
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−465%
350−400
+465%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−510%
1000−1050
+510%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Far Cry 5 28
−507%
170−180
+507%
Fortnite 65−70
−497%
400−450
+497%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−500%
210−220
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−500%
210−220
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−510%
250−260
+510%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−525%
250−260
+525%
Valorant 100−110
−488%
600−650
+488%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−500%
300−310
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−509%
140−150
+509%
Far Cry 5 26
−515%
160−170
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−525%
300−310
+525%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−500%
120−130
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−510%
250−260
+510%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Valorant 100−110
−488%
600−650
+488%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−497%
400−450
+497%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−519%
130−140
+519%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−488%
500−550
+488%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−500%
90−95
+500%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−480%
400−450
+480%
Valorant 120−130
−510%
750−800
+510%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−493%
160−170
+493%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Valorant 60−65
−483%
350−400
+483%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−491%
65−70
+491%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and RTX 5080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 Mobile is 525% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 Mobile is 507% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.03 69.10
Recency 26 October 2023 2 April 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 80 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 526.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.