GeForce MX550 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce MX550, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
2023
30 Watt
10.45
+2.6%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS outperforms MX550 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking456463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.0832.85
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361024
Core clock speedno data1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1320 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.24
Floating-point processing powerno data2.703 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 10.45
+2.6%
GeForce MX550 10.19

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6352
GeForce MX550 10005
+57.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6289
+2.7%
GeForce MX550 6126

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 40436
+0.2%
GeForce MX550 40364

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1712
GeForce MX550 2470
+44.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
−43.8%
46
+43.8%
1440p14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
4K27−30
−3.7%
28
+3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Far Cry 5 30
−50%
45
+50%
Fortnite 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−38.2%
47
+38.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Valorant 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1.9%
160−170
−1.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Far Cry 5 28
−35.7%
38
+35.7%
Fortnite 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+9.7%
31
−9.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
−57.1%
55
+57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
−25%
50
+25%
Valorant 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Far Cry 5 26
−34.6%
35
+34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−42.1%
27
+42.1%
Valorant 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+2.4%
80−85
−2.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+10%
70−75
−10%
Valorant 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+3.6%
27−30
−3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Valorant 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce MX550 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is 44% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 17% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX550 is 4% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 10% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX550 is 57% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS performs better in 40 tests (61%)
  • GeForce MX550 performs better in 8 tests (12%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.45 10.19
Recency 26 October 2023 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX550, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS and GeForce MX550.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 901 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS or GeForce MX550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.