Arc Pro B50 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023
40 Watt
9.47

Pro B50 outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking479194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency19.0734.32
Architectureno dataXe2 (2024)
GPU code nameno dataBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2023 (1 year ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data332.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8448 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−214%
110−120
+214%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−209%
170−180
+209%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−209%
170−180
+209%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Far Cry 5 31
−206%
95−100
+206%
Fortnite 60−65
−211%
190−200
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−195%
130−140
+195%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Valorant 95−100
−213%
300−310
+213%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−209%
170−180
+209%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−198%
450−500
+198%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Far Cry 5 30
−200%
90−95
+200%
Fortnite 60−65
−211%
190−200
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−195%
130−140
+195%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−206%
110−120
+206%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−193%
120−130
+193%
Valorant 95−100
−213%
300−310
+213%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Far Cry 5 27
−215%
85−90
+215%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−195%
130−140
+195%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−195%
65−70
+195%
Valorant 95−100
−213%
300−310
+213%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
−211%
190−200
+211%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−212%
240−250
+212%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%
Valorant 110−120
−170%
300−310
+170%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Valorant 50−55
−215%
170−180
+215%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B50 is 214% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.47 29.82
Recency 26 October 2023 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 70 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 75% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 214.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.