UHD Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 762 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 8 |
| Architecture | no data | Generation 11.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | Jasper Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 December 2018 (5 years old) | 11 January 2021 (3 years old) |
| Current price | no data | $457 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 256 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 750 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 10 nm+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 12.00 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Qualcomm Adreno 680 and UHD Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
UHD Graphics outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 203% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 6 December 2018 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and UHD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
