Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	249	204
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.71	23.28
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N19P-Q3	Navi 24
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199
Current price	$2221	$274 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6500 XT has 394% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1024
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	2610 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	2815 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	107 Watt
Texture fill rate	114.2	180.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6500 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	143.9 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.66

RX 6500 XT 24.68
+19.5%

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Mobile 7985

RX 6500 XT 9539
+19.5%

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 19% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Mobile 13524

RX 6500 XT 22954
+69.7%

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 70% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 −24%	62 +24%
1440p	27−30 −22.2%	33 +22.2%
4K	14−16 −28.6%	18 +28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−118%

72
+118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −17.1%	45−50 +17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −45.7%	51 +45.7%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −19.1%	80−85 +19.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −20%	50−55 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −63.6%	54 +63.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −13.5%	55−60 +13.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −17.5%	65−70 +17.5%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −17.9%	75−80 +17.9%
Hitman 3	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −159%	176 +159%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −16.1%	70−75 +16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −17.9%	65−70 +17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −113%	128 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −94.7%	74 +94.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −17.1%	45−50 +17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −22.9%	43 +22.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −19.1%	80−85 +19.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −20%	50−55 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −3%	34 +3%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +20.9%	43 −20.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +26.7%	45 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −17.9%	75−80 +17.9%
Hitman 3	45−50 +113%	23 −113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −103%	138 +103%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −43.5%	89 +43.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −17.9%	65−70 +17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −35%	81 +35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −104%	92 +104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −52.6%	58 +52.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −17.1%	45−50 +17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +12.9%	31 −12.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −20%	50−55 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +10%	30 −10%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −13.5%	55−60 +13.5%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −17.9%	75−80 +17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −35.3%	92 +35.3%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −32.3%	82 +32.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −20%	54 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +52%	25 −52%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

−17.9%

65−70
+17.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −17.5%	45−50 +17.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −23.8%	50−55 +23.8%
Hitman 3	30−33 −16.7%	35 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −21.1%	23 +21.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −22.2%	30−35 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −41.7%	17 +41.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −62.9%	57 +62.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −22.5%	45−50 +22.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −57.1%	66 +57.1%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −46.2%	57 +46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −30.2%	56 +30.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −35.7%	19 +35.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	40−45 −2.4%	42 +2.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −21.7%	27−30 +21.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 +60%	10 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −21.7%	27−30 +21.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −33.3%	28 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +83.3%	6 −83.3%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −20.8%	27−30 +20.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −21.4%	30−35 +21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −39.1%	32 +39.1%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +0%	20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−16.7%

21−24
+16.7%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 24% faster in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 22% faster in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 113% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 159% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
RX 6500 XT is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.66	24.68
Recency	27 May 2019	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	107 Watt