Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5
20.62

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 106% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking24779
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Value for money4.6947.34
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years ago)30 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Current price$2221 $283 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 909% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed1575 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate114.2331.4

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Mobile 20.62
RX 6600 XT 42.58
+106%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 106% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Mobile 7985
RX 6600 XT 16492
+107%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 107% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Mobile 13524
RX 6600 XT 39051
+189%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 189% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−120%
132
+120%
1440p35−40
−111%
74
+111%
4K18−20
−128%
41
+128%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−139%
79
+139%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−76.2%
70−75
+76.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−258%
129
+258%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−73.9%
120−130
+73.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−117%
110−120
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−136%
78
+136%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−180%
151
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−138%
131
+138%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.3%
120−130
+80.3%
Hitman 3 60−65
−268%
221
+268%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−211%
137
+211%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−277%
166
+277%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−200%
120
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−76.2%
70−75
+76.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−194%
106
+194%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−73.9%
120−130
+73.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−117%
110−120
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−130%
76
+130%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−161%
141
+161%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−131%
127
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.3%
120−130
+80.3%
Hitman 3 60−65
−205%
183
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−148%
109
+148%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−188%
95
+188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−223%
142
+223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−291%
176
+291%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−160%
104
+160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−76.2%
70−75
+76.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−108%
75
+108%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−73.9%
120−130
+73.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−109%
69
+109%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−146%
133
+146%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−104%
112
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−80.3%
120−130
+80.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−120%
99
+120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−52.5%
61
+52.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−132%
70−75
+132%
Hitman 3 30−35
−239%
112
+239%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−181%
76
+181%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−180%
56
+180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−211%
84
+211%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−109%
45−50
+109%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−195%
56
+195%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−91.3%
85−90
+91.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40
+233%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−200%
105
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−145%
98
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−117%
90−95
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−178%
60−65
+178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−193%
44
+193%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Hitman 3 18−20
−200%
57
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−53.8%
20
+53.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−183%
34
+183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−109%
21−24
+109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−186%
40
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−157%
54
+157%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−155%
28
+155%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−117%
50−55
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14
+250%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−200%
51
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−165%
53
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−167%
24
+167%

This is how T2000 Mobile and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 120% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 111% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 128% faster than T2000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 291% faster than the T2000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed T2000 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.62 42.58
Recency 27 May 2019 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 160 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 284 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3595 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.