Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro T2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Mobile with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
20.70
+64%

T2000 Mobile outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.01no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU117no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed1575 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data
Texture fill rate114.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+65%
60−65
−65%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+70%
40−45
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+65%
60−65
−65%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+65%
60−65
−65%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+65.7%
70−75
−65.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+72.9%
70−75
−72.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Hitman 3 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+64.6%
65−70
−64.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.70 12.62
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

T2000 Mobile has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, a 136433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 385 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.