GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
34.13
+61.4%

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms RTX 5060 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.338.55
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU104GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604608
Core clock speed1110 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6362.9
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS23.22 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs160144
Tensor Cores320144
Ray Tracing Cores4036

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s355.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.510.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD109
+67.7%
65−70
−67.7%
1440p61
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
4K49
+63.3%
30−35
−63.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Elden Ring 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+70.9%
55−60
−70.9%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+68.4%
95−100
−68.4%
Metro Exodus 103
+71.7%
60−65
−71.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Valorant 130−140
+70%
80−85
−70%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Dota 2 44
+63%
27−30
−63%
Elden Ring 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Far Cry 5 89
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Fortnite 150−160
+64.2%
95−100
−64.2%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+68.4%
95−100
−68.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+69.2%
65−70
−69.2%
Metro Exodus 51
+70%
30−33
−70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+4600%
4−5
−4600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+2825%
4−5
−2825%
Valorant 130−140
+70%
80−85
−70%
World of Tanks 270−280
+3375%
8−9
−3375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 81
+62%
50−55
−62%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+1050%
6−7
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Dota 2 127
+69.3%
75−80
−69.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+68.4%
95−100
−68.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+4600%
4−5
−4600%
Valorant 130−140
+70%
80−85
−70%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
Elden Ring 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
World of Tanks 210−220
+67.7%
130−140
−67.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+62.2%
45−50
−62.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Metro Exodus 77
+71.1%
45−50
−71.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Valorant 100−110
+2425%
4−5
−2425%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Dota 2 60−65
+327%
14−16
−327%
Elden Ring 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+66.2%
65−70
−66.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Dota 2 106
+63.1%
65−70
−63.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Fortnite 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Valorant 50−55 0−1

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and RTX 5060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 68% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 74% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 63% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4000 Mobile is 4600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4000 Mobile surpassed RTX 5060 in all 16 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.13 21.14
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 170 Watt

RTX 4000 Mobile has a 61.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 54.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 5060 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 30 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 292 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.