GeForce RTX 5090 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Place in the ranking	585	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	59
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.90	11.28
Power efficiency	6.65	12.54
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	GB202
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 July 2019 (5 years ago)	30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Pro WX 3200 has 14% better value for money than RTX 5090.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	21760
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	2017 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2407 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	575 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.62	1,637
Floating-point processing power	1.385 TFLOPS	104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	176
TMUs	32	680
Tensor Cores	no data	680
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	1.79 TB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4
CUDA	-	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 5.99

RTX 5090 100.00
+1569%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2414

RTX 5090 40367
+1572%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18 −1050%	207 +1050%
1440p	10−12 −1740%	184 +1740%
4K	9 −1467%	141 +1467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	11.06 −14.5%	9.66 +14.5%
1440p	19.90 −83.2%	10.86 +83.2%
4K	22.11 −56%	14.18 +56%

RTX 5090 has 14% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 5090 has 83% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 5090 has 56% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1508%	190−200 +1508%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −1515%	210−220 +1515%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −485%	110−120 +485%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1508%	190−200 +1508%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −1515%	210−220 +1515%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1438%	400−450 +1438%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −1521%	220−230 +1521%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −913%	160−170 +913%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −767%	150−160 +767%
Valorant	21−24 −2295%	500−550 +2295%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −485%	110−120 +485%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1508%	190−200 +1508%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −1515%	210−220 +1515%
Dota 2	16 −988%	170−180 +988%
Far Cry 5	15 −960%	159 +960%
Fortnite	35−40 −732%	300−350 +732%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1438%	400−450 +1438%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −1521%	220−230 +1521%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −1567%	350−400 +1567%
Metro Exodus	4 −3950%	160−170 +3950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −313%	210−220 +313%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −767%	150−160 +767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −770%	170−180 +770%
Valorant	21−24 −2295%	500−550 +2295%
World of Tanks	95−100 −182%	270−280 +182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −485%	110−120 +485%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1583%	202 +1583%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −1515%	210−220 +1515%
Dota 2	35 −1471%	550−600 +1471%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −434%	150−160 +434%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1438%	400−450 +1438%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −1521%	220−230 +1521%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −313%	210−220 +313%
Valorant	21−24 −2295%	500−550 +2295%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −2143%	150−160 +2143%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −1522%	600−650 +1522%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1760%	90−95 +1760%
World of Tanks	45−50 −1047%	500−550 +1047%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −770%	85−90 +770%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1500%	80−85 +1500%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −1131%	160−170 +1131%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1567%	200−210 +1567%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −1833%	170−180 +1833%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1688%	140−150 +1688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Valorant	16−18 −2488%	400−450 +2488%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1640%	174 +1640%
Dota 2	16−18 −971%	180−190 +971%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −1547%	280−290 +1547%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −8250%	167 +8250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −1061%	200−210 +1061%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1500%	60−65 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1547%	280−290 +1547%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1720%	90−95 +1720%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −450%	55 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Dota 2	9 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1400%	100−110 +1400%
Fortnite	6−7 −1500%	95−100 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −2700%	110−120 +2700%
Valorant	6−7 −3950%	240−250 +3950%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

183

+0%

183

+0%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

RTX 5090 is 1050% faster in 1080p
RTX 5090 is 1740% faster in 1440p
RTX 5090 is 1467% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 is 8250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 5090 is ahead in 44 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.99	100.00
Recency	2 July 2019	30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	575 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 784.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 1569.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.