GeForce RTX 5090 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 3200 with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 3200
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.13

RTX 5090 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 1531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5881
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.7911.03
Power efficiency6.6212.21
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 23GB202
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2019 (5 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Pro WX 3200 has 16% better value for money than RTX 5090.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64021760
Core clock speed1082 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate34.621,637
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs32680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 3200 6.13
RTX 5090 100.00
+1531%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2414
RTX 5090 39373
+1531%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−968%
203
+968%
1440p10−12
−1760%
186
+1760%
4K8
−1750%
148
+1750%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.47
−6.4%
9.85
+6.4%
1440p19.90
−85.2%
10.75
+85.2%
4K24.88
−84.2%
13.51
+84.2%
  • RTX 5090 has 6% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 has 85% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 has 84% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−1693%
250−260
+1693%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1546%
210−220
+1546%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1908%
240−250
+1908%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−1693%
250−260
+1693%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−688%
190−200
+688%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1546%
210−220
+1546%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1908%
240−250
+1908%
Far Cry 5 20
−985%
210−220
+985%
Fortnite 35−40
−763%
300−350
+763%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1174%
300−350
+1174%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1693%
250−260
+1693%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−705%
170−180
+705%
Valorant 65−70
−900%
650−700
+900%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−1693%
250−260
+1693%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−688%
190−200
+688%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1546%
210−220
+1546%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−184%
270−280
+184%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1908%
240−250
+1908%
Dota 2 49
−1431%
750−800
+1431%
Far Cry 5 18
−1106%
210−220
+1106%
Fortnite 35−40
−763%
300−350
+763%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1174%
300−350
+1174%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1693%
250−260
+1693%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−729%
170−180
+729%
Metro Exodus 10
−590%
69
+590%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−705%
170−180
+705%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−2820%
400−450
+2820%
Valorant 65−70
−900%
650−700
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−688%
190−200
+688%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1454%
202
+1454%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1908%
240−250
+1908%
Dota 2 35
−1471%
550−600
+1471%
Far Cry 5 17
−1176%
210−220
+1176%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1174%
300−350
+1174%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−705%
170−180
+705%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−3400%
350
+3400%
Valorant 65−70
−900%
650−700
+900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−763%
300−350
+763%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1047%
500−550
+1047%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−2314%
160−170
+2314%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−3940%
202
+3940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−373%
170−180
+373%
Valorant 65−70
−635%
450−500
+635%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−2078%
190−200
+2078%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3040%
150−160
+3040%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1625%
200−210
+1625%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−2086%
300−350
+2086%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−3467%
321
+3467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−1158%
150−160
+1158%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−2460%
128
+2460%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−17300%
174
+17300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1000%
180−190
+1000%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−16600%
167
+16600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−7460%
378
+7460%
Valorant 30−33
−1007%
300−350
+1007%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−3300%
130−140
+3300%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−5400%
55
+5400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%
Dota 2 9
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−3289%
300−350
+3289%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−1217%
75−80
+1217%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 183
+0%
183
+0%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 968% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 1760% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 1750% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 is 17300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 100.00
Recency 2 July 2019 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 575 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 784.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 1531.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1942 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 3200 or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.