Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3000 Mobile 3000 Max-Q 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 X2 Mobile 4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile 6000 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro B50 Pro B60

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
29.45

Pro B50 outperforms 4000 Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 4000 Mobile RTX 4000 Mobile
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency21.5734.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameTU104BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1110 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6332.8
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs160128
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores4016
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+7%
100−110
−7%
1440p63
+5%
60−65
−5%
4K47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.49
1440pno data5.82
4Kno data7.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−1.1%
180−190
+1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−1.1%
180−190
+1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Far Cry 5 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Fortnite 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 87
+2.4%
85−90
−2.4%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−1.1%
180−190
+1.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2.2%
270−280
−2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Dota 2 132
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100−105
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 143
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Dota 2 127
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Far Cry 5 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+3.7%
190−200
−3.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 230−240
+1.3%
230−240
−1.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 66
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 69
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2%
50−55
−2%
Valorant 190−200
+0.5%
190−200
−0.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Dota 2 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Far Cry 5 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

This is how RTX 4000 Mobile and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.45 29.82
Recency 27 May 2019 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and Arc Pro B50.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
PRO V710 Radeon PRO V710
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
Radeon 630 630
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
RX 540X RX 540X
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
RX 640 RX 640
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
T1000 Mobile T1000 Mobile
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
Quadro P520 P520
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 41 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.