Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameTU106BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920 ×22048
Core clock speed945 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate165.6 ×2332.8
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS ×210.65 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×216
TMUs120 ×2128
Tensor Cores240 ×2no data
Ray Tracing Cores30 ×216
L1 Cache1.9 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×216 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s ×2224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile and Arc Pro B50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.