Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Max-Q
2019
16 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.94

Pro B50 outperforms 5000 Max-Q by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency29.1434.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameTU104BMG-G21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (6 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed600 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate259.2332.8
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs192128
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores4816
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5000 Max-Q 28.94
Arc Pro B50 29.82
+3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5000 Max-Q 12795
Samples: 189
Arc Pro B50 13186
+3.1%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
+6%
100−110
−6%
1440p65
+0%
65−70
+0%
4K43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.49
1440pno data5.37
4Kno data8.73

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 131
+0.8%
130−140
−0.8%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Fortnite 140−150
+1.4%
140−150
−1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
−2%
100−105
+2%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
Valorant 190−200
−2.6%
200−210
+2.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−1.8%
280−290
+1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 122
+1.7%
120−130
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Fortnite 140−150
+1.4%
140−150
−1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
−2%
100−105
+2%
Grand Theft Auto V 108
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 73
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
+3.6%
140−150
−3.6%
Valorant 190−200
−2.6%
200−210
+2.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 112
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 118
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Far Cry 5 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
−3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
−2.4%
85−90
+2.4%
Valorant 141
+0.7%
140−150
−0.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+1.4%
140−150
−1.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−2.7%
75−80
+2.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−1.4%
220−230
+1.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 230−240
+0.4%
230−240
−0.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 91
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Far Cry 5 74
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 180−190
−1.1%
190−200
+1.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Dota 2 99
−1%
100−105
+1%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

This is how RTX 5000 Max-Q and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 6% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.94 29.82
Recency 27 May 2019 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and Arc Pro B50.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 57 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.