Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Place in the ranking	655	194
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.75	47.43
Power efficiency	6.13	34.32
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Xe2 (2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	BMG-G21
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 July 2019 (6 years ago)	5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B50 has 1165% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2048
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.62	332.8
Floating-point processing power	1.385 TFLOPS	10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16
L1 Cache	160 KB	no data
L2 Cache	512 KB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 5.0 x8
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 3200 4.95

Arc Pro B50 29.82
+502%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2190
Samples: 48

Arc Pro B50 13186
+502%

Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 −479%	110−120 +479%
4K	8 −463%	45−50 +463%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	10.47 −230%	3.17 +230%
4K	24.88 −221%	7.76 +221%

Arc Pro B50 has 230% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc Pro B50 has 221% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −500%	150−160 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	21−24 −491%	130−140 +491%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −500%	150−160 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Far Cry 5	20 −500%	120−130 +500%
Fortnite	30−35 −494%	190−200 +494%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −500%	90−95 +500%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −500%	120−130 +500%
Valorant	60−65 −447%	350−400 +447%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	21−24 −491%	130−140 +491%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −500%	150−160 +500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	90−95 −456%	500−550 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Dota 2	49 −492%	290−300 +492%
Far Cry 5	18 −456%	100−105 +456%
Fortnite	30−35 −494%	190−200 +494%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −500%	90−95 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Metro Exodus	10 −500%	60−65 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −500%	120−130 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −500%	90−95 +500%
Valorant	60−65 −447%	350−400 +447%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24 −491%	130−140 +491%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Dota 2	35 −500%	210−220 +500%
Far Cry 5	17 −488%	100−105 +488%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −483%	140−150 +483%
Hogwarts Legacy	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −500%	120−130 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −500%	60−65 +500%
Valorant	60−65 −447%	350−400 +447%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

30−35
−494%

190−200

+494%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	40−45 −485%	240−250 +485%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −483%	210−220 +483%
Valorant	55−60 −417%	300−310 +417%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Hogwarts Legacy	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

10−11

−500%

60−65
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −488%	100−105 +488%
Hogwarts Legacy	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −500%	30−33 +500%
Valorant	27−30 −493%	160−170 +493%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	9 −456%	50−55 +456%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Hogwarts Legacy	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

5−6
−500%

30−33

+500%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

Arc Pro B50 is 479% faster in 1080p
Arc Pro B50 is 463% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.95	29.82
Recency	2 July 2019	5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	70 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 7.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 502.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 89 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 3200 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Synthetic benchmarks

Combined synthetic benchmark score

Passmark

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Vote for your favorite

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments