Radeon Pro 5600M vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
25.71
+9.6%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms Pro 5600M by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.5732.95
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 12
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed945 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7164.8
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144160
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3000 Mobile 25.71
+9.6%
Pro 5600M 23.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+9.6%
Pro 5600M 9232

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+11.8%
85−90
−11.8%
4K88
+10%
80−85
−10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+11.5%
60−65
−11.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+12.5%
45−50
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+11.5%
60−65
−11.5%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+12.5%
45−50
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+7.9%
75−80
−7.9%
Fortnite 120−130
+7.1%
110−120
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+10.3%
85−90
−10.3%
Valorant 160−170
+6.3%
150−160
−6.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+11.5%
60−65
−11.5%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+3.6%
250−260
−3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+12.5%
45−50
−12.5%
Dota 2 132
+11.9%
110−120
−11.9%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+7.9%
75−80
−7.9%
Fortnite 120−130
+7.1%
110−120
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+8.4%
80−85
−8.4%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+12.2%
45−50
−12.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+10.3%
85−90
−10.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+65.2%
65−70
−65.2%
Valorant 160−170
+6.3%
150−160
−6.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+12.5%
45−50
−12.5%
Dota 2 121
+2.5%
110−120
−2.5%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+7.9%
75−80
−7.9%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+10.3%
85−90
−10.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Valorant 160−170
+6.3%
150−160
−6.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+7.1%
110−120
−7.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+8.1%
160−170
−8.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+4.5%
190−200
−4.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+7.9%
60−65
−7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+11.8%
50−55
−11.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+10.3%
55−60
−10.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+11.3%
50−55
−11.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+9.5%
40−45
−9.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
Valorant 140−150
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 88
+17.3%
75−80
−17.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 65% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 18% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.71 23.46
Recency 27 May 2019 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 9.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Radeon Pro 5600M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 319 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.