Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 2393$
Games supported 100%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 945
  • Max video memory 6144 MB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 14000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1350
  • Max video memory 4096 MB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 12000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 892$
Games supported 87%
Graphics card Graphics card NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating20174
Value for money16.0512.04
ArchitectureTuringTuring
GPU code nameN19E-Q1N18P-G62
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (2 years ago)2 April 2020 (1 year ago)
Price now$2393 $892
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201024
Core clock speed945 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate198.795.04

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 72.17
+147%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 29.23
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+40.3%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
RTX 3000 Mobile 13570
+48.5%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9140

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+50.2%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9882

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+49.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+15.6%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+29.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p93
+38.8%
67
−38.8%
1440pno data46
4K88
+252%
25
−252%

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+26.2%
61
−26.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+37.9%
66
−37.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+53.8%
65
−53.8%

1920x1080
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+34.8%
46
−34.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+38.7%
62
−38.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+58.5%
53
−58.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+51.4%
72
−51.4%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+44.4%
27
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+35.1%
57
−35.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+43.6%
39
−43.6%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 72.17 29.23
Novelty 27 May 2019 2 April 2020
Memory bus width 192 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 1024
Memory bandwidth 448 192
Thermal design power (TDP) 80 50

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 46% and lower by 96 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile from AMD is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire, which is slower by 3% and lower by 9 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


94 ratings
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
539 ratings
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.