T2000 Mobile vs RTX 3000 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RTX 3000 Mobile
26.10
+26.7%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 27% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking190246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money6.164.67
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q1N19P-Q3
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$2393 $2221
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3000 Mobile has 32% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201024
Core clock speed945 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate198.7114.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10
+26.7%
T2000 Mobile 20.60

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 27% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+26.7%
T2000 Mobile 7985

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 27% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+47%
T2000 Mobile 13524

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 47% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
4K88
+35.4%
65−70
−35.4%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+83.3%
40−45
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+27.8%
35−40
−27.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+21.7%
65−70
−21.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+27.8%
50−55
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%
Hitman 3 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+23.5%
30−35
−23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+127%
40−45
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+47.6%
40−45
−47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+27.8%
35−40
−27.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+21.7%
65−70
−21.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+27.8%
50−55
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+56.4%
55−60
−56.4%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%
Hitman 3 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+23.5%
30−35
−23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+90.9%
40−45
−90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+142%
45−50
−142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+27.8%
35−40
−27.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+21.7%
65−70
−21.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+40%
55−60
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Hitman 3 40−45
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+26.1%
45−50
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+28.6%
40−45
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Hitman 3 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+27.6%
27−30
−27.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 35.7% faster than T2000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 35.4% faster than T2000 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 142% faster than the T2000 Mobile.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 7.7% faster than the RTX 3000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.10 20.60
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 218 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.