Quadro T2000 Mobile vs RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	111	247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.06	4.69
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19E-Q5	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$3065	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 5000 Mobile has 72% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	1024
Core clock speed	1035 / 1350 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 / 1770 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 / 150 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	114.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 5000 Mobile 38.32
+85.7%

T2000 Mobile 20.63

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 5000 Mobile 14832
+85.7%

T2000 Mobile 7985

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 86% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 5000 Mobile 24620
+82.1%

T2000 Mobile 13524

RTX 5000 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by 82% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	132 +88.6%	70−75 −88.6%
1440p	84 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%
4K	54 +100%	27−30 −100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+103%

30−35

−103%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +148%	40−45 −148%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +86.1%	35−40 −86.1%
Battlefield 5	165 +139%	65−70 −139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	156 +189%	50−55 −189%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Far Cry 5	128 +137%	50−55 −137%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +66.2%	70−75 −66.2%
Hitman 3	120−130 +103%	60−65 −103%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +88.6%	40−45 −88.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 +271%	30−35 −271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	104 +136%	40−45 −136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	94 +124%	40−45 −124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +86.1%	35−40 −86.1%
Battlefield 5	162 +135%	65−70 −135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	132 +144%	50−55 −144%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Far Cry 5	123 +128%	50−55 −128%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +66.2%	70−75 −66.2%
Hitman 3	120−130 +103%	60−65 −103%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +88.6%	40−45 −88.6%
Metro Exodus	99 +200%	30−35 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +109%	30−35 −109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	99 +125%	40−45 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +302%	45−50 −302%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	73 +73.8%	40−45 −73.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 +86.1%	35−40 −86.1%
Battlefield 5	152 +120%	65−70 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Far Cry 5	115 +113%	50−55 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +66.2%	70−75 −66.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100 +122%	45−50 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	87 +181%	30−35 −181%
Hitman 3	70−75 +115%	30−35 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +100%	27−30 −100%
Metro Exodus	59 +195%	20−22 −195%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +193%	14−16 −193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	87 +222%	27−30 −222%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 +186%	21−24 −186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +121%	18−20 −121%
Battlefield 5	124 +170%	45−50 −170%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry 5	102 +191%	35−40 −191%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +80%	40−45 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +92.9%	40−45 −92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +139%	21−24 −139%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +127%	14−16 −127%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	49 +227%	14−16 −227%
Hitman 3	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +123%	12−14 −123%
Metro Exodus	37 +208%	12−14 −208%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +155%	10−12 −155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +236%	14−16 −236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +238%	21−24 −238%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Battlefield 5	73 +204%	24−27 −204%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	56 +229%	16−18 −229%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +100%	20−22 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +82.8%	27−30 −82.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%