GeForce MX350 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with GeForce MX350, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
25.26
+260%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms MX350 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.6625.19
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU106GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 February 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304640
Core clock speed945 MHz747 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz937 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate198.729.98
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS1.199 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14432
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s56.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3000 Mobile 25.26
+260%
GeForce MX350 7.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+260%
GeForce MX350 2812

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+222%
GeForce MX350 6166

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+240%
GeForce MX350 4371

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+269%
GeForce MX350 24744

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3000 Mobile 5589
+318%
GeForce MX350 1336

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+281%
27
−281%
1440p110−120
+255%
31
−255%
4K88
+238%
26
−238%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+250%
14
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+260%
14−16
−260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+196%
27
−196%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+345%
11
−345%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+980%
5
−980%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+266%
32
−266%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+229%
21
−229%
Metro Exodus 91
+225%
28
−225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+78.1%
32
−78.1%
Valorant 100−110
+304%
24−27
−304%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+248%
21−24
−248%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+277%
12−14
−277%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1250%
4
−1250%
Dota 2 44
−15.9%
51
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 86
+72%
50
−72%
Fortnite 130−140
+202%
40−45
−202%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+368%
25
−368%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+154%
35
−154%
Metro Exodus 43
+153%
17
−153%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110
+29.4%
85
−29.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+274%
21−24
−274%
Valorant 100−110
+400%
21
−400%
World of Tanks 260−270
+119%
120
−119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+371%
17
−371%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+277%
12−14
−277%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1700%
3
−1700%
Dota 2 121
+59.2%
76
−59.2%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+97.5%
40
−97.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+516%
19
−516%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+175%
55−60
−175%
Valorant 100−110
+304%
24−27
−304%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Dota 2 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+349%
35−40
−349%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
World of Tanks 170−180
+226%
50−55
−226%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+308%
12−14
−308%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+420%
14−16
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+373%
14−16
−373%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+282%
10−12
−282%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+445%
10−12
−445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Valorant 70−75
+279%
18−20
−279%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Dota 2 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 88
+193%
30
−193%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Fortnite 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Valorant 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 281% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 255% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 238% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 1700% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 16% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.26 7.02
Recency 27 May 2019 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 259.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX350 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 319 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1653 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile or GeForce MX350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.