Radeon RX 590 vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Radeon RX 590, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
23.14
+3.7%

P4200 outperforms RX 590 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking252266
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.35
Power efficiency17.609.70
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Polaris 30
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)15 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042304
Core clock speed1227 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2222.5
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs144144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4200 23.14
+3.7%
RX 590 22.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10490
+12.2%
RX 590 9352

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−2%
102
+2%
1440p60−65
+0%
60
+0%
4K35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.74
1440pno data4.65
4Kno data7.34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
−3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4.1%
45−50
−4.1%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−41.5%
133
+41.5%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
−3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4.1%
45−50
−4.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−10.4%
85
+10.4%
Fortnite 110−120
−18.8%
139
+18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−27.7%
120
+27.7%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+2.8%
70−75
−2.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−30.4%
120
+30.4%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%
Valorant 160−170
−83.5%
301
+83.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−18.1%
111
+18.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+3.8%
130−140
−3.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+1.7%
240−250
−1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4.1%
45−50
−4.1%
Dota 2 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−2.6%
79
+2.6%
Fortnite 110−120
−17.9%
138
+17.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−20.2%
113
+20.2%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+2.8%
70−75
−2.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+8.9%
79
−8.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−17.4%
108
+17.4%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−25.7%
88
+25.7%
Valorant 160−170
−75%
287
+75%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−6.4%
100
+6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4.1%
45−50
−4.1%
Dota 2 120−130
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+4.1%
74
−4.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+3.3%
91
−3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+10.8%
83
−10.8%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+37.3%
51
−37.3%
Valorant 160−170
+49.1%
110
−49.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+21.9%
96
−21.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+4.1%
45−50
−4.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+3.7%
160−170
−3.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+4.9%
40−45
−4.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%
Valorant 200−210
−14.9%
232
+14.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+3.1%
60−65
−3.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+5.2%
55−60
−5.2%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+3.7%
50−55
−3.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+7.3%
41
−7.3%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+5.3%
19
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
Valorant 130−140
+22.1%
113
−22.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−11.1%
40
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+2.6%
75−80
−2.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16.7%
24
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−12.2%
46
+12.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−40%
35
+40%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−11.5%
29
+11.5%

This is how Quadro P4200 and RX 590 compete in popular games:

  • RX 590 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • RX 590 is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 49% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 590 is 84% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 43 tests (66%)
  • RX 590 is ahead in 19 tests (29%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.14 22.32
Recency 21 February 2018 15 November 2018
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 175 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% lower power consumption.

RX 590, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4200 and Radeon RX 590.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 590 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 61 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2829 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or Radeon RX 590, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.