Quadro P4200 vs Radeon RX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

RX 580
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 185 Watt
23.01

P4200 outperforms RX 580 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking245215
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.16no data
Power efficiency8.5817.40
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 20GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042304
Core clock speed1257 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate193.0237.2
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 23.01
Quadro P4200 25.22
+9.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8847
Quadro P4200 10543
+19.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
−4.2%
100−110
+4.2%
1440p44
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
4K38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p5.20no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Elden Ring 75−80
−10.7%
80−85
+10.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+3.9%
75−80
−3.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−12.1%
110−120
+12.1%
Metro Exodus 83
+25.8%
65−70
−25.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Valorant 90−95
−8.6%
100−110
+8.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 117
+51.9%
75−80
−51.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Dota 2 51
−70.6%
85−90
+70.6%
Elden Ring 75−80
−10.7%
80−85
+10.7%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−5.5%
75−80
+5.5%
Fortnite 110−120
−6.8%
120−130
+6.8%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−12.1%
110−120
+12.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
−11.7%
85−90
+11.7%
Metro Exodus 57
−15.8%
65−70
+15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+27.8%
150−160
−27.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−10.8%
80−85
+10.8%
Valorant 90−95
−8.6%
100−110
+8.6%
World of Tanks 240−250
−4%
250−260
+4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
−13.2%
75−80
+13.2%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−10.9%
50−55
+10.9%
Dota 2 80−85
−8.8%
85−90
+8.8%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−5.5%
75−80
+5.5%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−12.1%
110−120
+12.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70
−126%
150−160
+126%
Valorant 90−95
−8.6%
100−110
+8.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−10.5%
40−45
+10.5%
Elden Ring 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−13.2%
40−45
+13.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.5%
21−24
+9.5%
World of Tanks 150−160
−8.4%
160−170
+8.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−8.5%
50−55
+8.5%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−15.8%
21−24
+15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−13.8%
70−75
+13.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−11.7%
65−70
+11.7%
Metro Exodus 53
−9.4%
55−60
+9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−12.1%
35−40
+12.1%
Valorant 60−65
−11.5%
65−70
+11.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Dota 2 57
+29.5%
40−45
−29.5%
Elden Ring 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+29.5%
40−45
−29.5%
Metro Exodus 18
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 73
−5.5%
75−80
+5.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+29.5%
40−45
−29.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Dota 2 35−40
−12.8%
40−45
+12.8%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Fortnite 31
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−11.4%
35−40
+11.4%
Valorant 27−30
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%

This is how RX 580 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 5% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 is 52% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 126% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 580 is ahead in 8 tests (13%)
  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 54 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.01 25.22
Recency 18 April 2017 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 100 Watt

RX 580 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 9.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 85% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 580 and Quadro P4200.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20397 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.