Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro P4200

Place in the ranking	211	459
Place by popularity	not in top-100	88
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 May 2018 (6 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	96
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	237.2	no data
Floating-point processing power	7.589 gflops	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	144	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	7132 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	70−75 +159%	27 −159%
1440p	30−35 +131%	13 −131%
4K	30−35 +150%	12 −150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+105%

−105%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +150%	22 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +105%	21 −105%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +183%	27−30 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +41.7%	36 −41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +156%	16 −156%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +164%	21−24 −164%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +154%	24−27 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +132%	60−65 −132%
Hitman 3	50−55 +113%	24 −113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −6.9%	124 +6.9%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +146%	35 −146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +282%	17 −282%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +174%	30−35 −174%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +14.4%	90 −14.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +139%	21−24 −139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +139%	18 −139%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +183%	27−30 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +59.4%	32 −59.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +215%	13 −215%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +164%	21−24 −164%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +154%	24−27 −154%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +132%	60−65 −132%
Hitman 3	50−55 +122%	23 −122%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +3.6%	112 −3.6%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +207%	28 −207%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +150%	26 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +183%	30 −183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +22.6%	84 −22.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +293%	14 −293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +207%	14−16 −207%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +122%	23 −122%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +273%	11 −273%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +164%	21−24 −164%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +132%	60−65 −132%
Hitman 3	50−55 +155%	20 −155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +404%	23 −404%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +254%	24 −254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +286%	14 −286%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +68.9%	60−65 −68.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+364%

−364%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +167%	18−20 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +171%	14−16 −171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +222%	9−10 −222%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +129%	7 −129%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +164%	10−12 −164%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +251%	40−45 −251%
Hitman 3	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +160%	20−22 −160%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +269%	12−14 −269%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +189%	19 −189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +244%	9−10 −244%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +137%	60−65 −137%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+163%

16−18

−163%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Hitman 3	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +231%	35−40 −231%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +314%	7−8 −314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +125%	12 −125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +182%	11 −182%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+144%

9−10

−144%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is 159% faster in 1080p
Quadro P4200 is 131% faster in 1440p
Quadro P4200 is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 500% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 7% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is ahead in 71 test (99%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.15	9.45
Recency	7 May 2018	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	16 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	28 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 166.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 310.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.