RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.86

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms P3200 by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking25029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.0333.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17926144
Core clock speed1328 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8417.6
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs112192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.86
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.00
+180%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8790
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24607
+180%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34289
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 147927
+331%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 35798
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 119922
+235%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
−171%
230−240
+171%
4K28
−168%
75−80
+168%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Elden Ring 70−75
−170%
200−210
+170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−168%
190−200
+168%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−176%
270−280
+176%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−179%
170−180
+179%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Valorant 90−95
−172%
250−260
+172%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−168%
190−200
+168%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Dota 2 40
−175%
110−120
+175%
Elden Ring 70−75
−170%
200−210
+170%
Far Cry 5 73
−174%
200−210
+174%
Fortnite 110−120
−156%
300−310
+156%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−176%
270−280
+176%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−178%
220−230
+178%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−179%
170−180
+179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−170%
400−450
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−174%
200−210
+174%
Valorant 90−95
−172%
250−260
+172%
World of Tanks 240−250
−162%
650−700
+162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−168%
190−200
+168%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Dota 2 112
−168%
300−310
+168%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−174%
200−210
+174%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−176%
270−280
+176%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−170%
400−450
+170%
Valorant 90−95
−172%
250−260
+172%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Elden Ring 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−163%
100−105
+163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−159%
450−500
+159%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
World of Tanks 150−160
−161%
400−450
+161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−169%
140−150
+169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%
Valorant 60−65
−167%
160−170
+167%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Dota 2 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Elden Ring 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−175%
190−200
+175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dota 2 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Fortnite 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Valorant 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 171% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 168% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.86 64.00
Recency 21 February 2018 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 73.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 180% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 300 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.