RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Quadro P3200

Place in the ranking	251	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.01	33.63
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP104	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	6144
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1543 MHz	2175 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	172.8	417.6
Floating-point processing power	5.53 TFLOPS	26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	112	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	245 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB/s	360.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.89

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 63.50
+177%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8795

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24402
+177%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34289

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 148023
+332%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Quadro P3200 35798

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 119922
+235%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	85 −171%	230−240 +171%
4K	28 −168%	75−80 +168%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −168%	190−200 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −173%	270−280 +173%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Valorant	90−95 −172%	250−260 +172%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −168%	190−200 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Dota 2	40 −175%	110−120 +175%
Far Cry 5	73 −174%	200−210 +174%
Fortnite	110−120 −156%	300−310 +156%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −173%	270−280 +173%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 −166%	210−220 +166%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −170%	400−450 +170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −174%	200−210 +174%
Valorant	90−95 −172%	250−260 +172%
World of Tanks	240−250 −162%	650−700 +162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −168%	190−200 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −162%	110−120 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Dota 2	112 −168%	300−310 +168%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −174%	200−210 +174%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −173%	270−280 +173%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −170%	400−450 +170%
Valorant	90−95 −172%	250−260 +172%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −163%	100−105 +163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −159%	450−500 +159%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
World of Tanks	150−160 −161%	400−450 +161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −167%	160−170 +167%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −170%	100−105 +170%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −169%	140−150 +169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −173%	90−95 +173%
Valorant	60−65 −162%	160−170 +162%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Dota 2	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −175%	190−200 +175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Dota 2	35−40 −156%	100−105 +156%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −167%	80−85 +167%
Fortnite	27−30 −168%	75−80 +168%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −171%	95−100 +171%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Valorant	27−30 −176%	80−85 +176%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 171% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 168% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.89	63.50
Recency	21 February 2018	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	130 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 73.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 177.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.