RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Quadro P3200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with RTX 4500 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
19.42

RTX 4500 Ada Generation outperforms P3200 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.5023.81
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927680
Core clock speed1328 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8619.2
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs112240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P3200 19.42
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 63.17
+225%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8676
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 28224
+225%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34271
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 194197
+467%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P3200 34942
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 176069
+404%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
−221%
270−280
+221%
4K28
−221%
90−95
+221%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−187%
350−400
+187%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−210%
130−140
+210%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−214%
270−280
+214%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−187%
350−400
+187%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Far Cry 5 79
−216%
250−260
+216%
Fortnite 100−110
−221%
350−400
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 95
−216%
300−310
+216%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−213%
210−220
+213%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−210%
130−140
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−221%
260−270
+221%
Valorant 150−160
−196%
450−500
+196%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−214%
270−280
+214%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−187%
350−400
+187%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−210%
750−800
+210%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Dota 2 119
−194%
350−400
+194%
Far Cry 5 74
−224%
240−250
+224%
Fortnite 100−110
−221%
350−400
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−218%
280−290
+218%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−213%
210−220
+213%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−221%
250−260
+221%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−210%
130−140
+210%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−221%
260−270
+221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
−221%
270−280
+221%
Valorant 150−160
−196%
450−500
+196%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−214%
270−280
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Dota 2 112
−213%
350−400
+213%
Far Cry 5 70
−214%
220−230
+214%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−219%
230−240
+219%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−210%
130−140
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−221%
260−270
+221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−204%
140−150
+204%
Valorant 150−160
−196%
450−500
+196%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−221%
350−400
+221%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−198%
450−500
+198%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−224%
120−130
+224%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−218%
550−600
+218%
Valorant 190−200
−214%
600−650
+214%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−217%
190−200
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−215%
170−180
+215%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−206%
150−160
+206%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−221%
90−95
+221%
Valorant 120−130
−189%
350−400
+189%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Dota 2 70−75
−224%
230−240
+224%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−224%
120−130
+224%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 221% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 221% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.42 63.17
Recency 21 February 2018 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 210 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 180% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 225.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 315 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 21 vote

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.