Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4000 Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
63.78
+9.4%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms PRO W7700 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.43
Power efficiency33.6221.02
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2023 (1 year ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61443072
Core clock speed1500 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2175 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate417.6499.2
Floating-point processing power26.73 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs8096
TMUs192192
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length245 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount20 GB16 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 63.78
+9.4%
PRO W7700 58.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24572
+9.4%
PRO W7700 22456

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.78 58.29
Recency 9 August 2023 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 190 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX 4000 Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7700.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.