Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs P3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	273	292
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.82	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N17E-Q1	N19P-Q1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$537	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	75.60
Floating-point performance	3,110 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 +16.4%	55−60 −16.4%
4K	28 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+11.1%

27−30

−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +8.3%	35−40 −8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +8.5%	55−60 −8.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +8.2%	60−65 −8.2%
Hitman 3	55−60 +12.2%	45−50 −12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +10.8%	35−40 −10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +10.8%	35−40 −10.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +8.3%	35−40 −8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +8.5%	55−60 −8.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +8.2%	60−65 −8.2%
Hitman 3	55−60 +12.2%	45−50 −12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +10.8%	35−40 −10.8%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +10.8%	35−40 −10.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +70.3%	35−40 −70.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +8.3%	35−40 −8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +8.5%	55−60 −8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +10.6%	45−50 −10.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +8.2%	60−65 −8.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −12.1%	35−40 +12.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +11.5%	24−27 −11.5%
Hitman 3	30−35 +10.7%	27−30 −10.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +13.6%	21−24 −13.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +10.5%	35−40 −10.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Hitman 3	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

This is how P3000 Mobile and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is 16.4% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 1080p
P3000 Mobile is 16.7% faster than T1000 Max-Q in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 70.3% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 12.1% faster than the P3000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.21	17.38
Recency	11 January 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt