Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Quadro P2000 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
Quadro P2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL by an impressive 80% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 301 | 437 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.32 | 2.57 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | GP107GL | Polaris 22 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 1 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Current price | $1477 | $1307 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
P2000 Mobile has 29% better value for money than RX Vega M GL.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1011 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 77.14 | 80.88 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 2,588 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Quadro P2000 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega M GL compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.13 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.91 | 9.39 |
| Recency | 5 July 2017 | 1 February 2018 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Quadro P2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
