Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P4200 Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro P3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.75

P3000 Mobile outperforms RX Vega M GL by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking448327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7315.49
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801280
Core clock speed931 MHz1088 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8897.20
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS3.11 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s168 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.75
P3000 Mobile 16.23
+66.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3898
P3000 Mobile 6486
+66.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−85.7%
65
+85.7%
4K18−20
−72.2%
31
+72.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−55.9%
90−95
+55.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−51.3%
110−120
+51.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−67.7%
50−55
+67.7%
World of Tanks 140−150
−43.2%
200−210
+43.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−51.3%
110−120
+51.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
World of Tanks 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and P3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 86% faster in 1080p
  • P3000 Mobile is 72% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 68% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 53 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.75 16.23
Recency 1 February 2018 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

P3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 66.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
Pro 570 Radeon Pro 570
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
ATI X1950 XT Radeon X1950 XT
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
vs
GeForce2 Ultra GeForce2 Ultra
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Max-Q
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
vs
6600 GT AGP GeForce 6600 GT AGP
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
vs
6600 AGP GeForce 6600 AGP
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
vs
Pro W6900X Radeon Pro W6900X
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
vs
RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 162 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.