Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.80

P3200 outperforms RX Vega M GL by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7720.99
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed931 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1543 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88172.8
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.80
Quadro P3200 22.03
+125%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3902
Quadro P3200 8771
+125%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−143%
85
+143%
4K12−14
−133%
28
+133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−120%
130−140
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−118%
170−180
+118%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−8.1%
40
+8.1%
Fortnite 55−60
−98.3%
110−120
+98.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−119%
75−80
+119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−89.7%
140−150
+89.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−135%
70−75
+135%
World of Tanks 140−150
−69.2%
240−250
+69.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−203%
112
+203%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−89.7%
140−150
+89.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−120%
130−140
+120%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−95%
35−40
+95%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−95%
35−40
+95%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−95%
35−40
+95%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
World of Tanks 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 143% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 133% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 203% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 53 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.80 22.03
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 124.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
TITAN V CEO Edition V CEO Edition
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB 3050 8 GB
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
HD Graphics 5600 Graphics 5600
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
HD 6290 HD 6290
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
GTX 675M SLI GTX 675M SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 308 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.