Quadro FX 2500M vs FirePro M2000
Aggregated performance score
FirePro M2000 outperforms Quadro FX 2500M by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1044 | 1167 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.02 | no data |
Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | G7x (2005−2007) |
GPU code name | Turks GLM | G71glm |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 (11 years ago) | 29 September 2005 (18 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $99.99 |
Current price | $387 | $126 (1.3x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
FirePro M2000 and FX 2500M have a nearly equal value for money.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 8 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 500 MHz |
Number of transistors | 716 million | 278 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 12.00 | 12.00 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on FirePro M2000 and Quadro FX 2500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | n/a | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Form factor | chip-down | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
StereoOutput3D | 1 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FirePro M2000 outperforms Quadro FX 2500M by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
FirePro M2000 outperforms Quadro FX 2500M by 95% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 9
+125%
| 4−5
−125%
|
Full HD | 16
+100%
| 8−9
−100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how FirePro M2000 and FX 2500M compete in popular games:
- FirePro M2000 is 125% faster than FX 2500M in 900p
- FirePro M2000 is 100% faster than FX 2500M in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro M2000 is 100% faster than the FX 2500M.
All in all, in popular games:
- FirePro M2000 is ahead in 12 tests (48%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (52%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.09 | 0.56 |
Recency | 1 July 2012 | 29 September 2005 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
The FirePro M2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2500M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.