Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Quadro 5000M

Place in performance ranking	577	79
Place by popularity	not in top-100	51
Value for money	0.08	47.22
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Fermi	Navi 23
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 July 2010 (13 years old)	30 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$379
Current price	$3732	$283 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 58925% better value for money than Quadro 5000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	2048
Core clock speed	405 MHz	1968 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2589 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate	16.20	331.4
Floating-point performance	518.4 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro 5000M and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	190 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.32

RX 6600 XT 42.56
+700%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro 5000M by 700% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 5000M 2059

RX 6600 XT 16485
+701%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro 5000M by 701% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 5000M 7767

RX 6600 XT 88163
+1035%

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Quadro 5000M by 1035% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −725%	132 +725%
1440p	9−10 −722%	74 +722%
4K	5−6 −720%	41 +720%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−778%

79
+778%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −640%	70−75 +640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −2480%	129 +2480%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −650%	120−130 +650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −582%	110−120 +582%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −767%	78 +767%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1273%	151 +1273%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −992%	131 +992%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −653%	120−130 +653%
Hitman 3	12−14 −1742%	221 +1742%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1270%	137 +1270%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −590%	65−70 +590%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1177%	166 +1177%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −1614%	120 +1614%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −640%	70−75 +640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −2020%	106 +2020%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −650%	120−130 +650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −582%	110−120 +582%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −744%	76 +744%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1182%	141 +1182%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −958%	127 +958%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −653%	120−130 +653%
Hitman 3	12−14 −1425%	183 +1425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −990%	109 +990%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1088%	95 +1088%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −590%	65−70 +590%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −992%	142 +992%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1500%	176 +1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −1386%	104 +1386%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −640%	70−75 +640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1400%	75 +1400%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −650%	120−130 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −667%	69 +667%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1109%	133 +1109%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −833%	112 +833%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −653%	120−130 +653%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −800%	99 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −771%	61 +771%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −800%	70−75 +800%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1144%	112 +1144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −533%	76 +533%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1767%	56 +1767%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −950%	84 +950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1433%	45−50 +1433%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −4300%	85−90 +4300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1213%	105 +1213%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1860%	98 +1860%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −1200%	90−95 +1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1180%	60−65 +1180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −4300%	44 +4300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1040%	57 +1040%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −2600%	54 +2600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Battlefield 5	0−1	50−55
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	14
Far Cry 5	5−6 −920%	51 +920%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −657%	53 +657%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	24

This is how Quadro 5000M and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RX 6600 XT is 725% faster than Quadro 5000M

1440p resolution:

RX 6600 XT is 722% faster than Quadro 5000M

4K resolution:

RX 6600 XT is 720% faster than Quadro 5000M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 4300% faster than the Quadro 5000M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed Quadro 5000M in all 63 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	5.32	42.56
Recency	27 July 2010	30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	160 Watt