GeForce RTX 4090 vs Quadro 5000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.35

RTX 4090 outperforms 5000M by a whopping 1769% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6171
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.83
Power efficiency3.6915.33
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF100AD102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016384
Core clock speed405 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate16.201,290
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs40512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.35
RTX 4090 100.00
+1769%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
RTX 4090 38452
+1768%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 5000M 7767
RTX 4090 137609
+1672%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−2050%
258
+2050%
1440p10−12
−1870%
197
+1870%
4K7−8
−1943%
143
+1943%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.20
1440pno data8.12
4Kno data11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1531%
212
+1531%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1945%
225
+1945%
Elden Ring 12−14
−1815%
249
+1815%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−631%
110−120
+631%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1554%
215
+1554%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−909%
111
+909%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−2423%
555
+2423%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1269%
178
+1269%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−875%
150−160
+875%
Valorant 14−16
−5800%
826
+5800%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−631%
110−120
+631%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1431%
199
+1431%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−873%
107
+873%
Dota 2 18−20
−1011%
200
+1011%
Elden Ring 12−14
−3500%
468
+3500%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−473%
149
+473%
Fortnite 30−35
−894%
300−350
+894%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−2391%
548
+2391%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−867%
174
+867%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1308%
183
+1308%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−378%
210−220
+378%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−875%
150−160
+875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−924%
170−180
+924%
Valorant 14−16
−5443%
750−800
+5443%
World of Tanks 85−90
−221%
270−280
+221%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−631%
110−120
+631%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1323%
185
+1323%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−855%
105
+855%
Dota 2 18−20
−1144%
224
+1144%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−723%
210−220
+723%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−2373%
544
+2373%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−378%
210−220
+378%
Valorant 14−16
−4757%
680
+4757%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−3950%
162
+3950%
Elden Ring 6−7
−5617%
343
+5617%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−3120%
161
+3120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2225%
90−95
+2225%
World of Tanks 35−40
−1258%
500−550
+1258%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−988%
85−90
+988%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1589%
152
+1589%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1825%
77
+1825%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−6238%
507
+6238%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2940%
152
+2940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4267%
262
+4267%
Valorant 14−16
−3986%
572
+3986%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1000%
187
+1000%
Elden Ring 3−4
−6500%
198
+6500%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1069%
187
+1069%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−13600%
137
+13600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1293%
200−210
+1293%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1000%
187
+1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Dota 2 16−18
−1235%
227
+1235%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1650%
100−110
+1650%
Fortnite 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7000%
284
+7000%
Valorant 5−6
−7180%
364
+7180%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

This is how Quadro 5000M and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 2050% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 1870% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 1943% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 is 13600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.35 100.00
Recency 27 July 2010 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 450 Watt

Quadro 5000M has 350% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 1769.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1271.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15679 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.