GeForce 920A vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce 920A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 outperforms 920A by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 865 | 871 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.41 | 4.52 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
| GPU code name | M88 | GK208B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2008 (16 years ago) | 13 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 ×2 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 666 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 10.56 ×2 | 30.53 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4224 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 ×2 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB ×2 | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit ×2 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | 1001 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s ×2 | 16.02 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 3.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+14.3%
|
35−40
−14.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45
−7.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+9.5%
|
21−24
−9.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+14.3%
|
35−40
−14.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+9.5%
|
21−24
−9.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+14.3%
|
35−40
−14.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.26 | 2.17 |
| Recency | 1 September 2008 | 13 March 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 33 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 has a 4.1% higher aggregate performance score.
GeForce 920A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce 920A.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
