Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs HD Graphics 2500

Place in performance ranking	1137	766
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)	no data
GPU code name	Ivy Bridge GT1	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2012 (12 years ago)	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price	$521	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	no data
Core clock speed	650 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	392 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.900	no data
Floating-point performance	13.8 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 2500 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.0	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.80	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2500 0.68

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.75
+304%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 2500 351

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936
+452%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by 452% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−286%

27−30
+286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−400%

5−6
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Hitman 3	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Hitman 3	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Hitman 3	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%