Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	157	136
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GN20-E3 GA106	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	4 January 2021 (3 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	1792
Core clock speed	817 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1702 MHz	2903 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.0	325.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	8.6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Mobile 32.46

Pro W6600M 35.05
+8%

Radeon Pro W6600M outperforms GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3060 Mobile 12550

Pro W6600M 13549
+8%

Radeon Pro W6600M outperforms GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	101 +1%	100−110 −1%
1440p	69 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
4K	44 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

103
+71.7%

60−65

−71.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −5%	60−65 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 +24.6%	60−65 −24.6%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −7.5%	110−120 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +43.3%	60−65 −43.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −7%	100−110 +7%
Hitman 3	120 +37.9%	85−90 −37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	166 +29.7%	120−130 −29.7%
Metro Exodus	164 +76.3%	90−95 −76.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −6.1%	85−90 +6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	195 +66.7%	110−120 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	81 +24.6%	65−70 −24.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −5%	60−65 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 +4.9%	60−65 −4.9%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −7.5%	110−120 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +15%	60−65 −15%
Far Cry 5	80 +6.7%	75−80 −6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	47 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −7%	100−110 +7%
Hitman 3	93 +6.9%	85−90 −6.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	148 +15.6%	120−130 −15.6%
Metro Exodus	94 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	99 +13.8%	85−90 −13.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 +5.1%	110−120 −5.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	142 +65.1%	85−90 −65.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	71 +9.2%	65−70 −9.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −5%	60−65 +5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 −8.9%	60−65 +8.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +3.3%	60−65 −3.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −7%	100−110 +7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120 −6.7%	120−130 +6.7%
Metro Exodus	86 −8.1%	90−95 +8.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	78 −10.3%	85−90 +10.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	46 −41.3%	65−70 +41.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

96
+10.3%

85−90

−10.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −8.1%	65−70 +8.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	99 +23.8%	80−85 −23.8%
Hitman 3	64 +36.2%	45−50 −36.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40 +42.9%	27−30 −42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 +26.3%	35−40 −26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	48 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +50%	24−27 −50%
Far Cry 5	84 +33.3%	60−65 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −9.1%	70−75 +9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85 +13.3%	75−80 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	85 +28.8%	65−70 −28.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	101 +21.7%	80−85 −21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	34 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	68 +17.2%	55−60 −17.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	60 +36.4%	40−45 −36.4%
Hitman 3	41 +46.4%	27−30 −46.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −10.3%	40−45 +10.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55 +34.1%	40−45 −34.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Battlefield 5	63 +46.5%	40−45 −46.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	43 +34.4%	30−35 −34.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −6.7%	45−50 +6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	57 +32.6%	40−45 −32.6%
Metro Exodus	50 +38.9%	35−40 −38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 +11.8%	16−18 −11.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

44
+41.9%

30−35

−41.9%

This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

RTX 3060 Mobile is 1% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600M is 1% faster in 1440p
Pro W6600M is 2% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3060 Mobile is 76% faster.
in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 91% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3060 Mobile is ahead in 42 tests (58%)
Pro W6600M is ahead in 30 tests (42%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.46	35.05
Recency	4 January 2021	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	90 Watt