GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

Place in performance ranking	136	64
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 23	GN20-E8
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	7424
Core clock speed	no data	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	2903 MHz	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	325.1	292.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W6600M and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −40%	140 +40%
1440p	65−70 −35.4%	88 +35.4%
4K	40−45 −42.5%	57 +42.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65	no data
Battlefield 5	110−120	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65	no data
Far Cry 5	75−80	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90	no data
Forza Horizon 4	130−140	no data
Hitman 3	70−75	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150	no data
Metro Exodus	100−110	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65	no data
Battlefield 5	110−120	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65	no data
Far Cry 5	75−80	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90	no data
Forza Horizon 4	130−140	no data
Hitman 3	70−75	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150	no data
Metro Exodus	100−110	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65	no data
Far Cry 5	75−80	no data
Forza Horizon 4	130−140	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27	no data
Far Cry 5	60−65	no data
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	no data
Hitman 3	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80	no data
Metro Exodus	65−70	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30	no data
Hitman 3	27−30	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	20−22	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

no data

This is how Pro W6600M and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 40% faster in 1080p
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 35% faster in 1440p
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.08	46.06
Recency	8 June 2021	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	150 Watt