1060 Mobile vs 980 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 980 Mobile
22.12
+5%

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 5% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking232239
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money29.6532.30
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN16E-GXXN17E-G1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 September 2014 (9 years old)18 August 2016 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.82 $237.11
Current price$251 (0.6x MSRP)$240 (1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 9% better value for money than GTX 980 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed1064 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHz1708 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100-200 Watt80 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate144 billion/sec133.6
Floating-point performance4,358 gflops4,275 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+-

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor support4 displays+
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+2.2
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support++
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream++
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.03.0
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
VR Readyno data+
Anselno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Mobile 22.12
+5%
GTX 1060 Mobile 21.06

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 5% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Mobile 39702
+16.3%
GTX 1060 Mobile 34127

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 16% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Mobile 17201
+17.1%
GTX 1060 Mobile 14693

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 17% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Mobile 13047
+12.9%
GTX 1060 Mobile 11558

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 13% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Mobile 76705
+2.8%
GTX 1060 Mobile 74605

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 3% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 980 Mobile 347481
+16.5%
GTX 1060 Mobile 298378

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 16% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 107
+32.8%
GTX 1060 Mobile 81

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 33% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 49
+19.7%
GTX 1060 Mobile 41

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 20% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 6
+7%
GTX 1060 Mobile 6

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 7% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 54
+9.4%
GTX 1060 Mobile 49

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 9% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 35
GTX 1060 Mobile 35
+1.1%

1060 Mobile outperforms 980 Mobile by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 31
+9.6%
GTX 1060 Mobile 28

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 10% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 59
GTX 1060 Mobile 61
+2.7%

1060 Mobile outperforms 980 Mobile by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 980 Mobile 7
+106%
GTX 1060 Mobile 4

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 106% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 59
GTX 1060 Mobile 61
+2.7%

1060 Mobile outperforms 980 Mobile by 3% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 107
+32.8%
GTX 1060 Mobile 81

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 33% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 54
+9.4%
GTX 1060 Mobile 49

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 9% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 49
+19.7%
GTX 1060 Mobile 41

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 20% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 6
+7%
GTX 1060 Mobile 6

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 7% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 35
GTX 1060 Mobile 35
+1.1%

1060 Mobile outperforms 980 Mobile by 1% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 31
+9.6%
GTX 1060 Mobile 28

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 10% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 980 Mobile 7.2
+106%
GTX 1060 Mobile 3.5

980 Mobile outperforms 1060 Mobile by 106% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+43.5%
69
−43.5%
1440p45−50
+0%
45
+0%
4K45
+55.2%
29
−55.2%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−2.8%
37
+2.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−40.9%
62
+40.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−35.9%
53
+35.9%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−31.5%
96
+31.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−25.9%
73
+25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+20%
30
−20%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−29.3%
75
+29.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−16.9%
69
+16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−36%
102
+36%
Hitman 3 65−70
−16.9%
76
+16.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−31.9%
62
+31.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−44.4%
52
+44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−25%
60
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−27.9%
55
+27.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−22.7%
54
+22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−15.4%
45
+15.4%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−11%
81
+11%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−6.9%
62
+6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+44%
25
−44%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−17.2%
68
+17.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−11.9%
66
+11.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−21.3%
91
+21.3%
Hitman 3 65−70
+1.6%
64
−1.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4.4%
45
−4.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−11.1%
40
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+33.3%
27
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−6.3%
51
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+21.7%
69
−21.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−11.6%
48
+11.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+18.9%
37
−18.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+2.6%
38
−2.6%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+2.8%
71
−2.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+56.5%
23
−56.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−10.3%
64
+10.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−1.7%
60
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+5.6%
71
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+12.8%
39
−12.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+53.6%
28
−53.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−8.8%
37
+8.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
+5.9%
30−35
−5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−4.5%
23
+4.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
17
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−10.3%
32
+10.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−12.5%
27
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−28.6%
27
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−8.2%
53
+8.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−13.2%
43
+13.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−4.7%
45
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−26.7%
57
+26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−18.8%
19
+18.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−17.6%
20
+17.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+75%
8
−75%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−7.7%
14
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+15.4%
26
−15.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10
−20%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−7.7%
28
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−16.7%
21
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−9.5%
23
+9.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−12.9%
35
+12.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

This is how GTX 980 Mobile and GTX 1060 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 980 Mobile is 43.5% faster than GTX 1060 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1060 Mobile is 0% faster than GTX 980 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • GTX 980 Mobile is 55.2% faster than GTX 1060 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980 Mobile is 75% faster than the GTX 1060 Mobile.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 44.4% faster than the GTX 980 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Mobile is ahead in 22 tests (32%)
  • GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 22.12 21.06
Recency 22 September 2014 18 August 2016
Cost $395.82 $237.11
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 512 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.