Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Place in the ranking	162	264
Place by popularity	24	46
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.21	17.72
Power efficiency	19.30	12.11
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	TU116	Ellesmere
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 144% better value for money than RX 470.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	2048
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	926 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1206 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	169.9	154.4
Floating-point processing power	5.437 TFLOPS	4.94 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	96	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	211.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.56
+59.4%

RX 470 21.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12905
+59.4%

RX 470 8096

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+29.9%

RX 470 17625

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
+34.8%

RX 470 11885

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 93095
+36%

RX 470 68475

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 483604
+27%

RX 470 380689

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	103 +45.1%	71 −45.1%
1440p	60 +53.8%	39 −53.8%
4K	39 +2.6%	38 −2.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.71 −7.4%	2.52 +7.4%
1440p	4.65 −1.3%	4.59 +1.3%
4K	7.15 −51.9%	4.71 +51.9%

RX 470 has 7% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti and RX 470 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1440p
RX 470 has 52% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +76.3%	35−40 −76.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +85.7%	40−45 −85.7%
Elden Ring	84 +25.4%	65−70 −25.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90 +36.4%	65−70 −36.4%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +76.3%	35−40 −76.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 −16.7%	40−45 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	156 +48.6%	105 −48.6%
Metro Exodus	98 +32.4%	74 −32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +148%	45−50 −148%
Valorant	161 +89.4%	85−90 −89.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	123 +86.4%	65−70 −86.4%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +76.3%	35−40 −76.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 −50%	40−45 +50%
Dota 2	140 +192%	48 −192%
Elden Ring	116 +73.1%	65−70 −73.1%
Far Cry 5	118 +127%	52 −127%
Fortnite	134 +21.8%	110−120 −21.8%
Forza Horizon 4	127 +44.3%	88 −44.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	119 +63%	73 −63%
Metro Exodus	68 +100%	34 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +163%	71 −163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 −6.7%	45−50 +6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +71.6%	65−70 −71.6%
Valorant	82 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
World of Tanks	270−280 +16.8%	230−240 −16.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +18.2%	65−70 −18.2%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +76.3%	35−40 −76.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −82.6%	40−45 +82.6%
Dota 2	168 +127%	70−75 −127%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +30.4%	65−70 −30.4%
Forza Horizon 4	110 +64.2%	67 −64.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	98 +66.1%	59 −66.1%
Valorant	118 +38.8%	85−90 −38.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	62 +87.9%	33 −87.9%
Elden Ring	62 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +87.9%	33 −87.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +1.2%	170−180 −1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +47.4%	18−20 −47.4%
World of Tanks	210−220 +51.4%	140−150 −51.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	63 +46.5%	40−45 −46.5%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +82.8%	55−60 −82.8%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +52.9%	51 −52.9%
Metro Exodus	65 +41.3%	46 −41.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +89.7%	27−30 −89.7%
Valorant	82 +49.1%	55−60 −49.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Dota 2	56 +69.7%	33 −69.7%
Elden Ring	25 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	56 +69.7%	33 −69.7%
Metro Exodus	21 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +71%	62 −71%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +69.7%	33 −69.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	94 +9.3%	86 −9.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +74.1%	27−30 −74.1%
Fortnite	45−50 +80%	25 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +72%	25 −72%
Valorant	41 +57.7%	24−27 −57.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and RX 470 compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is 45% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti is 54% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti is 3% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 192% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 470 is 83% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is ahead in 56 tests (89%)
RX 470 is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.56	21.06
Recency	22 February 2019	4 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm

GTX 1660 Ti has a 59.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.