GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 470

Place in the ranking	265	189
Place by popularity	46	40
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.98	47.52
Power efficiency	12.10	17.44
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	TU116
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 164% better value for money than RX 470.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1408
Core clock speed	926 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	1206 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	154.4	157.1
Floating-point processing power	4.94 TFLOPS	5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	128	88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth	211.2 GB/s	192.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.06

GTX 1660 30.34
+44.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096

GTX 1660 11661
+44%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 470 17625

GTX 1660 21064
+19.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 470 11885

GTX 1660 14164
+19.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 470 68475

GTX 1660 81755
+19.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 470 380689

GTX 1660 570753
+49.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	71 −18.3%	84 +18.3%
1440p	39 −30.8%	51 +30.8%
4K	38 +40.7%	27 −40.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.52 +3.4%	2.61 −3.4%
1440p	4.59 −6.9%	4.29 +6.9%
4K	4.71 +72.2%	8.11 −72.2%

RX 470 and GTX 1660 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1660 has 7% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 470 has 72% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −94.6%	72 +94.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −69%	71 +69%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −34.8%	85−90 +34.8%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −51.4%	56 +51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −31%	55 +31%
Forza Horizon 4	105 −25.7%	132 +25.7%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −53.6%	86 +53.6%
Metro Exodus	74 −28.4%	95 +28.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −133%	112 +133%
Valorant	85−90 −62.4%	138 +62.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −34.8%	85−90 +34.8%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −29.7%	48 +29.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −7.1%	45 +7.1%
Dota 2	48 −213%	150 +213%
Far Cry 5	52 −179%	145 +179%
Fortnite	110−120 −30.9%	140−150 +30.9%
Forza Horizon 4	88 −25%	110 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −12.5%	63 +12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	73 −57.5%	115 +57.5%
Metro Exodus	34 −94.1%	66 +94.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	71 −204%	216 +204%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +20%	40 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −52.2%	100−110 +52.2%
Valorant	85−90 +30.8%	65 −30.8%
World of Tanks	230−240 −15.1%	270−280 +15.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −34.8%	85−90 +34.8%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −16.2%	43 +16.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +10.5%	38 −10.5%
Dota 2	70−75 −166%	197 +166%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −24.6%	85−90 +24.6%
Forza Horizon 4	67 −41.8%	95 +41.8%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −5.4%	59 +5.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	59 −200%	170−180 +200%
Valorant	85−90 −35.3%	115 +35.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	33 −57.6%	52 +57.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 −57.6%	52 +57.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +34.1%	129 −34.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −31.6%	25 +31.6%
World of Tanks	140−150 −38%	190−200 +38%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +19.2%	26 −19.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −35.3%	23 +35.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −62.1%	90−95 +62.1%
Forza Horizon 4	51 −31.4%	67 +31.4%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −21.2%	40 +21.2%
Metro Exodus	46 −28.3%	59 +28.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −60%	45−50 +60%
Valorant	55−60 −30.9%	72 +30.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +12.5%	16 −12.5%
Dota 2	33 −48.5%	49 +48.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 −48.5%	49 +48.5%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −25%	20 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	62 −30.6%	81 +30.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −48.5%	49 +48.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Dota 2	86 −1.2%	87 +1.2%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −55.6%	40−45 +55.6%
Fortnite	25 −60%	40−45 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	25 −44%	36 +44%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −29.4%	22 +29.4%
Valorant	24−27 −46.2%	38 +46.2%

This is how RX 470 and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 is 18% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 is 31% faster in 1440p
RX 470 is 41% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 is 34% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 is 213% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 470 is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
GTX 1660 is ahead in 58 tests (91%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.06	30.34
Recency	4 August 2016	14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm

GTX 1660 has a 44.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.