Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Aggregated performance score

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6
26.19

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking190115
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Value for money27.0570.41
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$206 $366

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 64X has 160% better value for money than GTX 1650 SUPER.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804096
Core clock speed1530 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0375.8

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro Vega 64X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.19
Pro Vega 64X 37.77
+44.2%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10144
Pro Vega 64X 14630
+44.2%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 44% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1650 SUPER 55409
Pro Vega 64X 75438
+36.1%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 36% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
−38.9%
100−110
+38.9%
1440p36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
4K22
−36.4%
30−35
+36.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%
Battlefield 5 72
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−37.7%
95−100
+37.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−40%
70−75
+40%
Far Cry 5 93
−39.8%
130−140
+39.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 89
−34.8%
120−130
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−37.9%
120−130
+37.9%
Hitman 3 105
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
−35.1%
100−105
+35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Battlefield 5 58
−37.9%
80−85
+37.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−37.7%
95−100
+37.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 86
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−37.9%
120−130
+37.9%
Hitman 3 83
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 58
−37.9%
80−85
+37.9%
Metro Exodus 51
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−33.3%
120−130
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Battlefield 5 57
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Far Cry 5 79
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 76
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−37.9%
120−130
+37.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−40%
70−75
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Hitman 3 51
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Metro Exodus 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Battlefield 5 42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 54
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Hitman 3 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Metro Exodus 16
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Battlefield 5 24
−25%
30−33
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 24
−25%
30−33
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
−25%
10−11
+25%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and Pro Vega 64X compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 64X is 38.9% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 38.9% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 36.4% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER in 4K

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.19 37.77
Recency 29 October 2019 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 250 Watt

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4147 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.