Quadro P4200 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.
P4200 outperforms GTX 1060 Mobile by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 300 | 232 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 26.71 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.77 | 17.18 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GP106 | GP104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 | 237.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.275 TFLOPS | 7.589 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDCP | 2.2 | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GameStream | + | - |
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | no data |
| Optimus | - | + |
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Ansel | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 68
−25%
| 85−90
+25%
|
| 1440p | 45
−22.2%
| 55−60
+22.2%
|
| 4K | 30
−16.7%
| 35−40
+16.7%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 3.49 | no data |
| 1440p | 5.27 | no data |
| 4K | 7.90 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 137
+0.7%
|
130−140
−0.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 37
−37.8%
|
50−55
+37.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 48
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 96
+2.1%
|
90−95
−2.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110
−23.6%
|
130−140
+23.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30
−70%
|
50−55
+70%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75
−4%
|
75−80
+4%
|
| Fortnite | 177
+51.3%
|
110−120
−51.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 102
+8.5%
|
90−95
−8.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 69
−8.7%
|
75−80
+8.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35
−37.1%
|
45−50
+37.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 78
−17.9%
|
90−95
+17.9%
|
| Valorant | 136
−19.9%
|
160−170
+19.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 81
−16%
|
90−95
+16%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 73
−86.3%
|
130−140
+86.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 222
−14.9%
|
250−260
+14.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25
−104%
|
50−55
+104%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
−14.2%
|
120−130
+14.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 68
−14.7%
|
75−80
+14.7%
|
| Fortnite | 105
−11.4%
|
110−120
+11.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 91
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 61
−23%
|
75−80
+23%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 74
−16.2%
|
85−90
+16.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27
−77.8%
|
45−50
+77.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40
−30%
|
50−55
+30%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 67
−37.3%
|
90−95
+37.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 69
−1.4%
|
70−75
+1.4%
|
| Valorant | 134
−21.6%
|
160−170
+21.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 71
−32.4%
|
90−95
+32.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 23
−122%
|
50−55
+122%
|
| Dota 2 | 118
−2.5%
|
120−130
+2.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 64
−21.9%
|
75−80
+21.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 71
−32.4%
|
90−95
+32.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21
−129%
|
45−50
+129%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 52
−76.9%
|
90−95
+76.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 39
−79.5%
|
70−75
+79.5%
|
| Valorant | 72
−126%
|
160−170
+126%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 81
−44.4%
|
110−120
+44.4%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
−36.8%
|
50−55
+36.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
−24.6%
|
160−170
+24.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−34.4%
|
40−45
+34.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 23
−39.1%
|
30−35
+39.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
−3.6%
|
170−180
+3.6%
|
| Valorant | 133
−52.6%
|
200−210
+52.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 53
−24.5%
|
65−70
+24.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 43
−23.3%
|
50−55
+23.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 57
−7%
|
60−65
+7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22
−30%
|
24−27
+30%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−39.3%
|
35−40
+39.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50
−12%
|
55−60
+12%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−50%
|
24−27
+50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−29.4%
|
40−45
+29.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14
−42.9%
|
20−22
+42.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
−34.6%
|
35−40
+34.6%
|
| Valorant | 117
−17.9%
|
130−140
+17.9%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 28
−28.6%
|
35−40
+28.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−50%
|
24−27
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
−21.9%
|
75−80
+21.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21
−28.6%
|
27−30
+28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35
−20%
|
40−45
+20%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 17
−47.1%
|
24−27
+47.1%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 23
−13%
|
24−27
+13%
|
This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:
- Quadro P4200 is 25% faster in 1080p
- Quadro P4200 is 22% faster in 1440p
- Quadro P4200 is 17% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 51% faster.
- in Hogwarts Legacy, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 129% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
- Quadro P4200 is ahead in 61 test (92%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.95 | 21.71 |
| Recency | 15 August 2016 | 21 February 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
GTX 1060 Mobile has 25% lower power consumption.
Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 28.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
