Quadro P4200 vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
32.88
+49.9%

1080 SLI Mobile outperforms P4200 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.77
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202304
Core clock speed1556 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data237.2
Floating-point processing powerno data7.589 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
L1 Cacheno data864 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
4K95
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+46.3%
130−140
−46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+58.8%
50−55
−58.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+31.9%
90−95
−31.9%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+46.3%
130−140
−46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+58.8%
50−55
−58.8%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+46.8%
75−80
−46.8%
Fortnite 150−160
+32.5%
110−120
−32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+44.7%
90−95
−44.7%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+50%
70−75
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
Valorant 210−220
+28.7%
160−170
−28.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+31.9%
90−95
−31.9%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+46.3%
130−140
−46.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+9%
250−260
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+58.8%
50−55
−58.8%
Dota 2 140−150
+16.5%
120−130
−16.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+46.8%
75−80
−46.8%
Fortnite 150−160
+32.5%
110−120
−32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+44.7%
90−95
−44.7%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+50%
70−75
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+39.5%
85−90
−39.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+57.7%
50−55
−57.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+159%
70−75
−159%
Valorant 210−220
+28.7%
160−170
−28.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+31.9%
90−95
−31.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+58.8%
50−55
−58.8%
Dota 2 140−150
+16.5%
120−130
−16.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+46.8%
75−80
−46.8%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+44.7%
90−95
−44.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+64.3%
70−75
−64.3%
Valorant 210−220
+28.7%
160−170
−28.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+32.5%
110−120
−32.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+70%
50−55
−70%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+45.8%
160−170
−45.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+65.1%
40−45
−65.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+21.3%
200−210
−21.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+39.4%
65−70
−39.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+55.6%
50−55
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+63.3%
60−65
−63.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+68.4%
35−40
−68.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+62.5%
55−60
−62.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+68.2%
40−45
−68.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+149%
35−40
−149%
Valorant 210−220
+55.1%
130−140
−55.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+52.8%
35−40
−52.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Dota 2 100−110
+33.3%
75−80
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+80%
24−27
−80%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 52% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 58% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 159% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile performs better in 65 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.88 21.94
Recency 16 August 2016 21 February 2018

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile has a 49.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3239 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.