Quadro P2200 vs GRID M40
Aggregate performance score
Quadro P2200 outperforms GRID M40 by a whopping 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 641 | 212 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.38 | 32.38 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GM107 | GP106 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 10 June 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $484 | $409 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro P2200 has 8421% better value for money than GRID M40.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,870 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 33.06 | 119.4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 201 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.26 | 24.11 |
| Recency | 18 May 2016 | 10 June 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
