Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs FirePro W7170M

Place in performance ranking	474	212
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	1.19	no data
Architecture	GCN 3 (2014−2016)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Tonga	GP104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$600	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1792
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1139 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1404 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	157.2
Floating-point performance	2,961 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on FirePro W7170M and Quadro P3200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	168.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W7170M 8.17

P3200 Max-Q 23.81
+191%

Quadro P3200 Max-Q outperforms FirePro W7170M by 191% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

W7170M 3161

P3200 Max-Q 9218
+192%

Quadro P3200 Max-Q outperforms FirePro W7170M by 192% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−188%

150−160
+188%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−169%

35−40
+169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
Hitman 3	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
Hitman 3	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 −190%	90−95 +190%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 −183%	65−70 +183%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Hitman 3	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Hitman 3	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

This is how W7170M and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

P3200 Max-Q is 188% faster than W7170M in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	8.17	23.81
Recency	2 October 2015	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt