Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs FirePro W7170M

Place in the ranking	510	238
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.64	21.64
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Amethyst	GP104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (9 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1792
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1139 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1404 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	157.2
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	128	112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	168.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W7170M 8.21

P3200 Max-Q 23.63
+188%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W7170M 3161

P3200 Max-Q 9102
+188%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−173%

150−160
+173%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−169%

35−40
+169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Hitman 3	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −177%	130−140 +177%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Hitman 3	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −177%	130−140 +177%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 −181%	250−260 +181%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Hitman 3	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −177%	130−140 +177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 −183%	65−70 +183%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −181%	160−170 +181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−183%

65−70
+183%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −181%	90−95 +181%
Hitman 3	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −169%	140−150 +169%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−186%

40−45
+186%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Hitman 3	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−163%

21−24

+163%

This is how W7170M and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

P3200 Max-Q is 173% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.21	23.63
Recency	2 October 2015	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	75 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has a 187.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7170M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.