Quadro P4200 vs FirePro W7170M

Place in the ranking	512	215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.67	17.40
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Amethyst	GP104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (9 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2304
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1227 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1647 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	237.2
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	128	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
Optimus	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W7170M 8.22

Quadro P4200 25.22
+207%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W7170M 3161

Quadro P4200 10543
+234%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−196%

160−170
+196%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	45−50 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Elden Ring	21−24 −261%	80−85 +261%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −196%	75−80 +196%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	45−50 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −236%	110−120 +236%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −200%	65−70 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Valorant	27−30 −248%	100−110 +248%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −196%	75−80 +196%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	45−50 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Dota 2	27−30 −200%	85−90 +200%
Elden Ring	21−24 −261%	80−85 +261%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −120%	75−80 +120%
Fortnite	45−50 −163%	120−130 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −236%	110−120 +236%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −197%	85−90 +197%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −200%	65−70 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −143%	150−160 +143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −228%	80−85 +228%
Valorant	27−30 −248%	100−110 +248%
World of Tanks	120−130 −111%	250−260 +111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −196%	75−80 +196%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	45−50 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Dota 2	27−30 −200%	85−90 +200%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −120%	75−80 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −236%	110−120 +236%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −143%	150−160 +143%
Valorant	27−30 −248%	100−110 +248%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Elden Ring	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −330%	40−45 +330%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −327%	170−180 +327%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −229%	21−24 +229%
World of Tanks	55−60 −183%	160−170 +183%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −240%	50−55 +240%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −335%	70−75 +335%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −294%	65−70 +294%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −314%	55−60 +314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Valorant	21−24 −224%	65−70 +224%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Dota 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Elden Ring	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −144%	40−45 +144%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −221%	75−80 +221%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −144%	40−45 +144%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −271%	24−27 +271%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Dota 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −240%	30−35 +240%
Fortnite	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −333%	35−40 +333%
Valorant	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%

This is how W7170M and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is 196% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed W7170M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.22	25.22
Recency	2 October 2015	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 206.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W7170M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.