Radeon PRO W7700 vs Arc A770

Place in performance ranking	195	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.26	23.82
Architecture	Alchemist	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	DG2-512	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	$999
Current price	$597 (1.8x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 112% better value for money than Arc A770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	3072
Core clock speed	2100 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	614.4	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770 25.80

PRO W7700 52.37
+103%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Arc A770 by 103% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A770 9984

PRO W7700 20263
+103%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Arc A770 by 103% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 −102%	230−240 +102%
1440p	68 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%
4K	42 −102%	85−90 +102%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−102%

85−90
+102%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 −100%	130−140 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 −95.7%	180−190 +95.7%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Far Cry 5	117 −96.6%	230−240 +96.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	120 −100%	240−250 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	33 −97%	65−70 +97%
Hitman 3	75−80 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	126 −98.4%	250−260 +98.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	139 −101%	280−290 +101%
Watch Dogs: Legion	102 −96.1%	200−210 +96.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 −96.4%	110−120 +96.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 −103%	160−170 +103%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Far Cry 5	109 −102%	220−230 +102%
Far Cry New Dawn	114 −102%	230−240 +102%
Forza Horizon 4	31 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Hitman 3	75−80 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	109 −102%	220−230 +102%
Metro Exodus	113 −94.7%	220−230 +94.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 −95.1%	240−250 +95.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	196 −78.6%	350−400 +78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	93 −93.5%	180−190 +93.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −100%	90−95 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 −94.4%	140−150 +94.4%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −102%	85−90 +102%
Far Cry 5	104 −102%	210−220 +102%
Far Cry New Dawn	103 −94.2%	200−210 +94.2%
Forza Horizon 4	23 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 −94.4%	140−150 +94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 −103%	150−160 +103%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −100%	80−85 +100%
Hitman 3	40−45 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	84 −102%	170−180 +102%
Metro Exodus	71 −97.2%	140−150 +97.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −100%	40−45 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	86 −97.7%	170−180 +97.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 −100%	80−85 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −100%	120−130 +100%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −93%	110−120 +93%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Far Cry 5	82 −95.1%	160−170 +95.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	91 −97.8%	180−190 +97.8%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −100%	30−33 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 −100%	120−130 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −100%	40−45 +100%
Hitman 3	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Metro Exodus	47 −102%	95−100 +102%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	49 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −91.8%	140−150 +91.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 −100%	60−65 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 −97.4%	75−80 +97.4%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry 5	49 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	56 −96.4%	110−120 +96.4%
Forza Horizon 4	8 −100%	16−18 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	37 −103%	75−80 +103%

This is how Arc A770 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 102% faster in 1080p
PRO W7700 is 91% faster in 1440p
PRO W7700 is 102% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.80	52.37
Recency	12 October 2022	13 November 2023
Cost	$329	$999
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	190 Watt