GeForce GTX 1630 vs Arc A770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Arc A770
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
25.83
+99.9%

Arc A770 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking193363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.3812.79
ArchitectureAlchemistTuring (2018−2021)
GPU code nameDG2-512TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (1 year ago)28 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data
Current price$597 (1.8x MSRP)$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1630 has 12% better value for money than Arc A770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed2100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2400 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate614.457.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.01x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770 25.83
+99.9%
GTX 1630 12.92

Arc A770 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A770 9984
+100%
GTX 1630 4993

Arc A770 outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 100% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111
+102%
55−60
−102%
1440p70
+100%
35−40
−100%
4K44
+110%
21−24
−110%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+117%
30−33
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+104%
45−50
−104%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Hitman 3 60−65
+110%
30−33
−110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 203
+103%
100−105
−103%
Metro Exodus 144
+106%
70−75
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
+103%
150−160
−103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 102
+104%
50−55
−104%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+107%
27−30
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+126%
35−40
−126%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+113%
40−45
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 71
+103%
35−40
−103%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
+111%
27−30
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+121%
14−16
−121%
Hitman 3 60−65
+110%
30−33
−110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 171
+101%
85−90
−101%
Metro Exodus 114
+107%
55−60
−107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 187
+108%
90−95
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+106%
95−100
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
+107%
45−50
−107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+106%
35−40
−106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+102%
60−65
−102%
Metro Exodus 103
+106%
50−55
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+106%
35−40
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 74
+111%
35−40
−111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Far Cry New Dawn 133
+105%
65−70
−105%
Hitman 3 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+100%
30−33
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 82
+105%
40−45
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+100%
50−55
−100%
Metro Exodus 91
+102%
45−50
−102%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+111%
75−80
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+100%
30−33
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+119%
27−30
−119%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 58
+115%
27−30
−115%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+108%
40−45
−108%
Hitman 3 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 49
+104%
24−27
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+109%
35−40
−109%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+117%
30−33
−117%
Metro Exodus 56
+107%
27−30
−107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
+106%
18−20
−106%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

This is how Arc A770 and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 102% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 100% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 110% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.83 12.92
Recency 12 October 2022 28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5097 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1150 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.