Arc A730M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 35.55% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

Intel started Arc A730M sales 30 March 2022. This is a laptop graphics card based on a Xe HPG architecture and made with 6 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamers. 12 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 14 GHz are supplied, and together with 192 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP).

General info

Some basic facts about Arc A730M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking133
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureXe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameAlchemist
Market segmentLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Technical specs

Arc A730M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Arc A730M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed1100 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors21,700 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology6 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP)of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate211.2of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)

Size and compatibility

Information on Arc A730M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Arc A730M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width192 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed14000 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Arc A730M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API support

APIs supported by Arc A730M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.6
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL3.0
Vulkan1.3

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Arc A730M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A730M 35.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A730M 8033

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A730M 63380

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A730M 29144

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A730M 21294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A730M 83396

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Arc A730M 467230

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Arc A730M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
1440p46
4K22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 71

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
Battlefield 5 100−110
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 64
Far Cry 5 93
Far Cry New Dawn 84
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
Hitman 3 123
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
Watch Dogs: Legion 85

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
Battlefield 5 100−110
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 54
Far Cry 5 86
Far Cry New Dawn 81
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
Hitman 3 106
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
Metro Exodus 43
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
Watch Dogs: Legion 75

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
Battlefield 5 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 52
Far Cry 5 81
Far Cry New Dawn 74
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
Watch Dogs: Legion 48

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
Hitman 3 65
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
Metro Exodus 35−40
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
Battlefield 5 75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 31
Far Cry 5 60−65
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
Watch Dogs: Legion 35

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
Hitman 3 35−40
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 21
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 28
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
Battlefield 5 40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
Far Cry 5 35
Far Cry New Dawn 39
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20

Relative performance

Overall Arc A730M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

RTX 2080 Super Max-QGeForce RTX2080 Super Max-Q
Compare
RTX 2070 Super Max-QGeForce RTX2070 Super Max-Q
Compare
RX 6600MRadeon RX6600M
Compare
RTX 3000 Ada Generation MobileRTX3000 Ada Generation Mobile
Compare
RX 7600SRadeon RX7600S
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Arc A730M according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.7 100 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.